LRPS-RRO-2015- 9118185; In-depth Study on Violence against Children in Indonesia | ReliefWeb
1. Title of the assignment:
In-depth study of violence against children in Indonesia
2. Background and Justification
Although not sufficiently documented, violence against
children (‘VAC’) in Indonesia is a pervasive and widespread
violation of children’s rights and a public health concern
that requires in-depth study and address. Sexual, physical
and emotional violence occurs in the homes, schools and
communities of children throughout the whole country. Based
on available research, 40% of students aged 13-15 years
reported being physically attacked by peers in the past 12
months at school – one of the highest reported rates in the
world.[1] 50% of children reported bullying at school.[2] 56%
of boys and 29% of girls in institutions[3] reported
experiencing physical abuse.[4] Other studies on VAC are
limited in scope to cover only certain geographical areas. In
Papua Province, 91% of children aged between 2-14 years are
subjected to at least one form of psychological or physical
punishment by their caregivers; 26% are victims of severe
physical punishment.[5] A 2010 survey of five districts in
West Timor and East Nusa Tenggara Provinces revealed that
between 42 – 77% of children experienced physical violence
over a one-year period.[6] Albeit reliable and updated
national survey data on emotional violence, sexual violence
and neglect is not available, in 2014, 72% of children and
adolescents aged 10-24 years reported online that they had
witnessed some form of violence against children in their
lifetimes.
Despite these efforts, data on the overall situation of
violence against children is lacking. This Terms of Reference
(TOR) describes the rationale and main components of Stage 1
of a multi-stage approach to exploring and addressing the
drivers of violence against children in Indonesia to address
this data gap. The goal of the ToR is to translate research
and move it more effectively into the policy and practice
guidelines and implementation throughout Indonesia. UNICEF
calls this the Research to Policy and Practice Process (R3P),
based in part on the learning from theMulticountry Study
on the Drivers of Violence Affecting Children. This
study will ensure that findings from Indonesia inform the
growing global dialogue on what triggers violence and how
best to respond to it. The R3P provides a series of
methodologies to provide a road map to understanding violence
and how it operationalizes in society drawing on diverse
sources of information.
Confronted with growing global evidence on the incidence and
prevalence of violence, governments and policy makers are
asking:*What drives violence affecting children and what can
be done to address it?*Identifying and analyzing how
structural determinants – the social, cultural, economic,
legal, organizational and policy responses – interact to
affect everyday violence in children’s homes and communities
will identify causal pathways to better inform national
strategies and interventions for violence prevention and
response.This Study involves grounding within a comprehensive
literature review and secondary data analysis. Learning more
and unpacking the determinants if violence – focusing on
girls and boys at different stages of the life course. It
will build upon the work already being undertaken by UNICEF
Indonesia: a preliminary review of international “gray”
literature and selected academic articles, and an
interventions mapping. The overall study is intended to
contribute to national conversation on how to focus the
subsequent stages of the process, namely testing
interventions to prevent violence.
In 2015, the government of Indonesia and UNICEF agreed to
conduct a transparent and competitive process to solicit
partners to conduct this in-depth study. This activity is
reflected in the Multi-Year Workplan (MYWP) between UNICEF
and the Government of Indonesia and will engage academic,
NGO, government and UN partners as well as collaborate with
young people for their views and inputs.
3. Purpose of the assignment:
This Study will aim to serve as the foundation for a larger
process for understanding and addressing violence against
children in Indonesia. Researcher(s)—one principal
international and a small team will explore and unpack
different variables associated with violence to identify
areas for further exploration as well as gaps where evidence
is missing. A collaboration between an international academic
institution (e.g. university) and a local research
organisation or individual is preferable.
This process will be comprised of three components:
1) Academic systematic literature review which includes a
scoping of existing “grey literature” (informally published
written materials, such as research reports and briefing
papers that may be difficult to locate through conventional
literature searches);
2) Secondary analysis of existing selected datasets;
3) Interventions mapping of related prevention and response
efforts.
These three components will allow for the identification of
initial hypotheses around the drivers of or determinants of
violence. The results of this work will be used to guide
discussions on priority areas for further exploration or
interventions. The overall purpose of this assignment is to
inform policy and practice in Indonesia to better prevent and
respond to violence against children.
4. Scope of Work:
A team composed by an international and a local consultant
are currently conducting a preliminary interventions mapping
of efforts to prevent and respond to violence against
children, and a preliminary review of international “grey
literature” and selected academic articles on VAC in
Indonesia. Both outputs are expected to be delivered in April
2015. Therefore, the work to be carried out under the present
ToR shall build upon and complement the research that is
already being produced. This will include 4 phases:
4. 1. Literature Review
The literature review shall analyse several key international
databases such as: PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO (EBSCOhost),
CINAHL-ebsco, ERIC, EmBase Social Work, Abstracts and
SocIndex, to locate peer-reviewed journal articles about
violence affecting children in Indonesia. This search will
employ a mix of both free text and controlled vocabulary of
subject heading and keyword searches to identify articles
visa electronic databases. In addition articles shall be
reviewed from the following journals:
· Child Abuse and Neglect
· Child Maltreatment
· Child Abuse Review, and
· Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Articles that meet the inclusion criteria shall be read fully
and key information extracted into an Excel file. The review
report will build upon the preliminary literature review
already undertaken by UNICEF Indonesia, which covered a
selected number of articles from the above-databases.
4. 2. Grey literature review
It is expected that much of the research on violence
affecting children will be found in grey literature format.
Working with the national researchers, and building upon the
previously conducted international grey literature review
(above), a grey literature search strategy will be developed.
Such review is expected to focus mainly on national grey
literature available in local languages, and will include the
following components: -Reports and data from the National
Surveillance on Violence
-Report and data from NGO SWAGAA
-Outreach to INGOs and CBOs (including UNICEF country
office);
-Outreach to regional or national government sources;
-Identification and outreach to key field experts and other
researchers in the country;
-Outreach to other regional and international practitioners
and researchers;
-Search of local and international websites.
Grey literature that meets the inclusion criteria will
undergo the same rigorous data extraction process as the
journal articles (e.g. pulling out key information for the
study). This process will also include reviewing evaluations
that have been completed on any prevention and response
issues that address some aspect of violence against children.
4.3. Interventions Mapping
Interventions mapping is a critical component to the R3P. It
happens concurrently utilising the search strategies listed
for the literature review and the grey literature review.
This is currently being undertaken by a national consultant
who works in cooperation with an international consultant;
the goals of this mapping exercise are to: 1) gain a better
understanding of the existing and previous child maltreatment
prevention and response interventions in Indonesia; 2) map
which interventions have been evaluated, 3) understand the
theories of change and which drivers of violence the
interventions sought to address and 4) to identify potential
promising interventions for (re)design, implementation and
testing. The contractor is expected to review and update the
interventions mapping previously undertaken by UNICEF
Indonesia, to edit it up to publication standards and to
transfer information related to interventions into the R3P
mapping matrix (above).
4.4. Secondary Data Analysis
Working in collaboration with the national and international
teams, the principal consultant will include a robust
secondary data analysis of the existing national data sets,
guided by results from the literature review. National and
local studies completed over the last 10 years will be
collected by the national consultant in tandem with the
international consultant and then subjected to a set of
criteria to ascertain if the data is rigorous enough for
secondary analysis. A data analysis plan will be developed
and reviewed by UNICEF and the funder which will subsequently
be reviewed by Government counterparts. It is envisioned that
the data analysis will include a mediational analysis to
further explore the relationships of drivers to each other
and the impact of potential mediating factors on the
determinants of violence. In addition, a latent class
analysis shall also be conducted to better understand the
experiences of various groups. Mediational analysis is
context specific and will be driven by the components of
theories of change discovered during the literature review.
The secondary analysis will be integrated into the systematic
literature review and interventions mapping to explore more
in-depth specific drivers and/or the risk and protective
factors that affect children exposed to violence.
Institutions submitting bids for this TOR are requested to
submit a timeline and suggested workplan for the work along
the below phases: spread across 5 months as follows:
Task 1
Development of an overall inception report for the Study
Deliverable
An inception report including reference to:
· Internal briefings with the UNICEF office and national
steering committee (comprised of UNICEF, the government and
civil society representatives) established in Indonesia to
discuss timeline, deliverables and to gather a better sense
of policy and practice objectives for the study;
· The study design;
· Review of current literature (grey and published) to date;
· The data analysis plan;
Timeframe/duration
Within the first 2 weeks
Task 2
Progress report
Deliverable
A progress report on:
· The systematic literature review (including grey and
published literature);
· The secondary data analysis (of selected datasets); and
· Intervention mapping.
Timeframe/duration
Within 1 month of signature of contract
Task 3
Secondary data analysis
Deliverable
A draft secondary data analysis report, including:
· Finalise data extraction for the systematic review;
· Finalise intervention mapping
Timeframe/duration
Within 2 months of signature of contract
Task 4
Systematic literature review, intervention mapping and
secondary analysis finalisation
Deliverable
Draft systematic literature review, draft Intervention
Mapping and revised Secondary Data Analysis Reports
Timeframe/duration
Within 4 months of signature of contract
Task 5
Editing and finalisation of all research reports
Deliverable
Final Literature Review, Intervention Mapping and Secondary
Data Analysis Reports, fully edited and incorporating
relevant feedback from UNICEF and partners.
Timeframe/duration
Within 5 months of signature of contract
5.Reporting Requirements:
At the end of the consultancy period three research reports
will be available: i) Systematic Literature Review, ii)
Intervention Mapping, iii) Secondary Data Analysis. Time
permitting, these research reports will be combined into one
comprehensive analytical study. This study will be used to
inform national policy and programmes. All research must
follow APA style writing standards, with correct referencing,
English and table/ graphics formatting. Poorly edited reports
will not be accepted.
6. Methodology:
Please see the “Scope of Work” section above (section 4).
7. Timing/duration of contract:
Submitting organisations/ institutions should include a draft
workplan in their bid submission. All work is to be completed
within five months upon signature of contract.
8. Qualifications Required:
UNICEF seeks to partner with an international research
institution (with a lead international researcher/
consultant). This institution should submit a bid including
at least 1 national researcher and/or local academic
institution with whom to collaborate during the consultancy.
Qualifications of research team include:
· An established international research institution with the
ability to deliver a detailed research and analysis on
drivers of violence against children. The international
institution’s team profile will include expertise, knowledge
of and familiarity with child rights concepts, with
international children’s legislative frameworks, and with the
programming environment in relation to child protection;
· The international research team (including at 1
international team leader) will have a demonstrated ability
to write effectively in a highly engaging format accessible
to wider public and also policy makers on child protection
concerns. Previous experience of working with UNICEF on child
protection research is an asset. Examples of the proposed
team leader’s published works (reports, journal articles) to
be submitted with the proposal;
· The team leader within the international institution will
have an advanced university degree in social sciences with at
least eight years professional experience in the field of
social science research as well as current expertise in the
field of violence against children demonstrated through
up-to-date published reports and/or research.
· The proposal will include identification of at least one
national local consultant/ research organisation with
experience working with national datasets in the social
sectors (health, education, HIV, other) in Indonesia. Child
protection research expertise is an asset. The proposal will
include the specifics of how the international institution
will work with the local consultant/ organisation to
productively deliver timely results.
"261.414906486">
How to apply:
- MARKING AND RETURNING OF PROPOSALS
1.1 SEALED PROPOSALS must be dispatched to arrive at the
UNICEF office indicated NO LATER THAN 16:00 hours Jakarta
Local Time on Monday; 04 May 2015. Proposals received in any
manner other than as outlined in clauses 1.3 to 1.5, will be
INVALIDATED.
1.2 Proposals shall be submitted in duplicate, in English,
and shall be sealed in one outer and two inner envelopes. All
envelopes shall indicate the bidder’s name and address. The
outer envelope shall be addressed as follows:
Attention: Supply Unit
UNICEF Jakarta, World Trade Center 6, 10th Floor
Jl. Jenderal Sudirman, Kav 31, Jakarta 12920
RFP No. LRPS-RRO-2015-9118185
In-depth Analysis of Violence against Children in Indonesia
DUE: Monday; 04 May 2015 at 16.00 hours
To facilitate the submission of both Technical and Financial
proposals, the submission duly stamped and signed can be done
electronically in PDF format and sent to
"mailto:jakartasupply@unicef.org">jakartasupply@unicef.org.
Technical and Price proposals should be sent as separate PDF
files. If the Technical and Price proposals are sent in the
same PDF file, they will be rejected. Please make sure to
mention the RFP reference number in the subject’s line. To
secure your Price Proposal please set-up a password which
will be used at a later stage once the evaluation of the
technical proposal is complete. The bidders who achieve the
minimum score of 50 points of technical evaluation will be
requested to provide passwords.
Please be aware that proposals emailed to UNICEF will be
rejected if they are received after the deadline for bid
submission. As an email may take some time to arrive after it
is sent, especially if it contains a lot of information, we
advise all bidders to send email submissions well before the
deadline. Bidders can send as many emails as needed however,
the size of each email should be less than 5 MB.
1.3 The first inner envelope shall be marked Technical
Proposal (all in Word, Excel, Powerpoint and PDF file. Hard
copy is not required) and addressed in the same manner as the
outer envelope, and shall contain CD/DVD/USB Flash Drive with
the following documentation:
(a) The proposed strategy for completion of the work as
detailed in the Terms of Reference;
(b) The proposed implementation/execution plan for completion
of the work as detailed in the Terms of Reference;
(c) Supplier profile, including Bidder registration/
incorporation documents, experience, client list with contact
person and number for verification etc;
(d) The proposed team who will complete the work, including
leader, members, experience and capability;
(e) Corporate organogram (both of the supplier and the
proposed team who will carry out the work);
(f) Request for Proposal For Services Form
(g) Proposed Activity Schedule
(h) The latest 2 years audited Financial Statement; and
(i) Any other technical information that is relevant to the
requirement.
1.4 The second inner envelope (sealed) shall be marked Price
Proposal (all in Word, Excel, Powerpoint and PDF file. Hard
copy is not required) and addressed in the same manner as the
outer envelope. It shall contain CD/DVD/USB Flash Drive with
the following documentation:
(a) Schedule of Price (Attachment III)
1.5 The Price Proposal must cover all the services to be
provided and it must itemize the following:
(a) A summary of the total cost for the proposed services,
excluding taxes from which UNICEF is exempted, as outlined in
clause C of the General Terms and Conditions;
(b) A proposed schedule of payments;
(c) Other costs, if any, indicating nature and breakdown.
1.6 Information which the bidder considers to be proprietary
should be clearly marked as such. All information provided by
the bidder will be treated as confidential and used for
UNICEF’s internal purposes only.
- TIME FOR RECEIVING PROPOSALS
2.1 Sealed Proposals received prior to the stated closing
time and date will be kept unopened and no proposal received
thereafter will be considered.
2.2 UNICEF will not accept any responsibility for a premature
opening of a Proposal which is not properly addressed or
identified.
- CORRECTIONS
3.1 Erasures or other corrections in the Proposal must be
explained and the signature of the Bidder shown alongside.
- MODIFICATION AND WITHDRAWAL
4.1 All changes to a Proposal must be received prior to the
closing time and date. It must be clearly indicated that it
is a modification and that it supersedes the earlier Proposal
or states the changes from the original Proposal.
4.2 Proposals may be withdrawn on written or faxed request
received from Bidders prior to the deadline of the submission
of proposals. Negligence on the part of the Bidder provides
no right for the withdrawal of the Proposal after the
deadline. Bidders are expected to examine all instructions
pertaining to the work. Failure to do so will be at bidder’s
own risk and disadvantage.
- VALIDITY OF PROPOSALS
5.1 Proposals should be valid for a period of not less than
one year after the deadline of the RFP, unless otherwise
specified in the Specific Terms and Conditions. Bidders are
requested to indicate the validity period of their Proposal,
as UNICEF may award additional contracts against the lowest
acceptable Proposal if requests for identical services are
received during the Proposal validity period. UNICEF may also
request the validity period to be extended.
- BIDDER RESPONSE
6.1 Formal submission requirements
The formal submission requirements as outlined in this
Request for Proposal must be followed, e.g. regarding form
and timing of submission, marking of the envelopes, no price
information in the technical proposal, etc.
6.2 Mandatory criteria
All mandatory (i.e. must/have to/shall/should) criteria
mentioned throughout this Request for Proposal have to be
addressed and met in your proposal.
6.3 Proposal Form
The completed and signed bid form must be submitted together
with the proposal.
6.4 Technical Proposal Form
The technical proposal should address all aspects and
criteria outlined in this Request for Proposal, especially in
its Terms of Reference, Technical Requirement, and
“Evaluation Criteria” of this Request for Proposal. However,
all these requirements represent a wish list from UNICEF. The
bidders are free to suggest/ propose any other solution.
UNICEF welcomes new ideas and innovative approaches.
No price information should be contained in the technical
proposal.
6.5 Price Proposal
The price proposal should be as per but not limited to
ATTACHMENT III (Schedule of Prices/Rate) of this Request for
Proposal.
- DISCOUNTS
7.1 Discounts on faster payment are acceptable to UNICEF.
Time in connection with discounts offered will be computed
from the date of receipt at UNICEF office of COMPLETE PAYMENT
DOCUMENTATION as specified in the Contract.
Any discounts for any reason other than those mentioned on
the RFP Form must be stated in the Proposal.
- QUALITY ASSURANCE
8.1 If the Bidder is already certified, or is in the process
of being certified in accordance with ISO 9001/9002/BS, this
should be clearly indicated in the Proposal and a copy of the
Certificate should be attached to the proposal.
- RIGHTS OF UNICEF
9.1 UNICEF reserves the right to accept any proposal, in
whole or in part; or, to reject any or all proposals.
9.2 UNICEF reserves the right to INVALIDATE any Proposal
received from a Bidder who, in the opinion of UNICEF, is not
in a position to perform the Contract.
9.3 UNICEF reserves the right to INVALIDATE any Proposal for
reasons mentioned above, and, unless otherwise specified by
UNICEF or by the Bidder, to accept any item in the Proposal.
- EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
10.1 Following closure of the RFP, each proposal will be
evaluated by a UNICEF evaluation team.
10.2 A second-stage procedure will be utilized in evaluating
Proposals, with evaluation of the Technical Proposal to be
completed prior to any evaluation of the Price Proposal.
Technical Proposals will be evaluated for compliance against
the “Evaluation Criteria” of the RFP.
10.3 The Technical Proposal has a total possible evaluation
value of 70 points. Technical Proposals receiving 50 points
or higher, will be considered technically responsive and the
Price Proposal will be opened. Proposals which are not
considered to be technically compliant and non-responsive
will not be given further consideration.
10.4 The total number of points allocated for the Price
Proposal is 30. The evaluation shall be based on the
evaluation score stated in the evaluation criteria. Rate
proposed will be compared between Bidders and Bidder whose
offer gets the highest score in terms of frequency in
offering the lowest price for items in each category, will
receive the highest maximum score available. Other Bidders
will receive score based on the following formula:
Max. Score * lowest priced proposal
Score for price proposal X =
———————————
Priced of proposal X
- AWARD/ADJUDICATION OF PROPOSALS
11.1 The final selection of the most responsive Proposals
will be based on the best Proposal overall, in terms of
technical score and price. UNICEF reserves the right to make
multiple arrangements for any goods/services where, in the
opinion of UNICEF, the lowest acceptable Bidder cannot fully
meet the delivery requirements or if it is deemed to be in
UNICEF’s best interest to do so. Any arrangement under this
condition will be made on the basis of the lowest, second
lowest and third lowest, etc. bid which meets all the
requirements under “Evaluation Criteria”.
- ERROR IN PROPOSAL
12.1 Bidders are expected to examine all Schedules and
Instructions pertaining to the RFP. Failure to do so will be
at the Bidders’ own risk. In case of errors in the extension
price, unit price shall govern.
- RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS
13.1 This RFP and any responses thereto, shall be the
property of UNICEF. In submitting a Proposal, the bidder
acknowledges that UNICEF reserves the right to:
(a) Visit and inspect the Bidder’s premises;
(b) Contact any/all referees provided;
(c) Request additional supporting or supplementary
information;
(d) Arrange interviews with the proposed project
team/consultants;
(e) Reject any/all of the Proposals submitted;
(f) Accept any Proposal in whole or in part;
(g) Negotiate with the most favorable Bidder;
(h) Award contracts to more than one Bidder, if UNICEF
considers this to be in the best its interests
13.2 Bidders shall bear all costs associated with the
preparation and submission of Proposals and UNICEF shall not
be responsible for these costs, irrespective of the outcome
of the bidding process.
- To enable you to submit a proposal, attached are:
Attachment I for Terms of Reference (TOR)
Attachment II for Evaluation Criteria
Attachment III for Price Proposal Form (Response Format)
0 comments:
Post a Comment